Nazwa przedmiotu:
Przedmiot obieralny 2 - Systemic design for sustainability development
Koordynator przedmiotu:
brak
Status przedmiotu:
Obowiązkowy
Poziom kształcenia:
Studia II stopnia
Program:
Geodesy and Cartography
Grupa przedmiotów:
Obieralne
Kod przedmiotu:
1060-
Semestr nominalny:
2 / rok ak. 2023/2024
Liczba punktów ECTS:
2
Liczba godzin pracy studenta związanych z osiągnięciem efektów uczenia się:
1. Number of contact hours: 32, including a) 30 hours of projects b) 2 hours of consultations, 2. Student's own work - 18 hours, including a) 12 hours of implementation of project tasks b) 6 hours of analysis of literature; 3) TOTAL: 60 hours, which corresponds to 2 ECTS points
Liczba punktów ECTS na zajęciach wymagających bezpośredniego udziału nauczycieli akademickich:
Number of contact hours: 32, including a) 30 hours of projects b) 2 hours of consultations. The workload related to activities that require direct teacher participation is 32 hours, which corresponds to 1 ECTS credit.
Język prowadzenia zajęć:
angielski
Liczba punktów ECTS, którą student uzyskuje w ramach zajęć o charakterze praktycznym:
a) 30 hours of projects b) 2 hours of consultations, Student's own work - 12 hours of implementation of project tasks; TOTAL: 44 hours
Formy zajęć i ich wymiar w semestrze:
  • Wykład0h
  • Ćwiczenia0h
  • Laboratorium0h
  • Projekt30h
  • Lekcje komputerowe0h
Wymagania wstępne:
no prerequisites
Limit liczby studentów:
30
Cel przedmiotu:
brak
Treści kształcenia:
brak
Metody oceny:
The final assessment of knowledge and skills consists of the grade from exercises. The lecturer has the right to revise it by half of the grade. Obtaining more than 60% of points from all assessments/reports and class attendance is required. The additional elements of the assessment of the exercises are the substantive activity of the student and teamwork evaluation. More than two unjustified absences mean Student's failing the project. Design Process - Is the Student active in activities and lectures? - Are the global and local contexts issues developed? - Are multiple options for the solution explored? - Are the systemic design tools properly used? - Was the project completed at the time it was due? Design Solution - Are the adequate SDGs addressed? - Are all leverage points considered? - Are the design solutions prototyped in VR/AR environment? Presentation - Is the graphic communication clearly expressed? - Is the verbal communication clearly and thoughtfully organized? - Is adequate information presented to support the design? - Is the presentation clear and legible? - Is the concept or research foundation for the developed ideas clearly presented?
Egzamin:
nie
Literatura:
Literature JONES, P., VAN AEL, K. 2022. Design Journeys through Complex Systems: Practice Tools for Systemic Design. BIS Publishers BV; Edycja 1, Amsterdam, pp. 240 Supplementary literature 2016. Follow the Rabbit: A Field Guide to Systemic Design. Government of Alberta CoLab. Version 1.0. Meadows, D.H., Wright, D., 2008. Thinking in systems : a primer. Chelsea Green Pub., White River Junction, Vt. Senge, P.M., 2006. The fifth discipline : the art and practice of the learning organization, Rev. and updated. ed. Doubleday/Currency, New York. Cat Drew, Jessie Johnson, Simran Chadha, Celina Carlisle, Anstey Burnett, Nat Hunter. 2018. Beyond net zero: a systemic design approach. Design Council, Design Economy https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/our-work/skills-learning/tools-frameworks/beyond-net-zero-a-systemic-design-approach/ https://www.systemicdesigntoolkit.org https://miro.com/miroverse/the-systemic-four-design-thinking-tools-for-circular-economy/ https://thesystemsthinker.com/ https://learningforsustainability.net https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/
Witryna www przedmiotu:
brak
Uwagi:
brak

Efekty uczenia się

Profil praktyczny - wiedza

Efekt

Weryfikacja:
Powiązane efekty kierunkowe:
Powiązane efekty obszarowe:

Profil ogólnoakademicki - wiedza

Efekt W_01
one has theoretical knowledge about system thinking, design thinking, and systemic design
Weryfikacja: exercises and activity during classes
Powiązane efekty kierunkowe: K_W06, K_W16
Powiązane efekty obszarowe: T2A_W09, T2A_W11, T2A_W02, T2A_W05, T2A_W08

Profil ogólnoakademicki - umiejętności

Efekt U_01
One is able to obtain information from literature, databases, and other sources; is able to integrate the received information, interpret and critically evaluate it, draw conclusions and formulate and comprehensively justify opinions
Weryfikacja: exercises and activity during classes
Powiązane efekty kierunkowe: K_U01
Powiązane efekty obszarowe: T2A_U01
Efekt U_02
One is able to prototype design solutions in a team in the VR environment
Weryfikacja: exercises and activity during classes
Powiązane efekty kierunkowe: K_U02
Powiązane efekty obszarowe: T2A_U02, T2A_U03

Profil ogólnoakademicki - kompetencje społeczne

Efekt K_01
One is able to think and act in a creative and entrepreneurial way
Weryfikacja: exercises and activity during classes
Powiązane efekty kierunkowe: K_K01
Powiązane efekty obszarowe: T2A_K06
Efekt K_02
One is aware of the importance and understands the non-technical aspects and effects of engineering activities, including their impact on the environment, and the related responsibility for decisions made
Weryfikacja: exercises and activity during classes
Powiązane efekty kierunkowe: K_K03
Powiązane efekty obszarowe: T2A_K02
Efekt K_03
One is able to cooperate and work in a group, assuming various roles in it.
Weryfikacja: exercises and activity during classes
Powiązane efekty kierunkowe: K_K04
Powiązane efekty obszarowe: T2A_K03